by Review by Lightsey Darst
December 8, 2008
Dance critic Lightsey Darst weighs in on the offerings presented recently at the Walker's annual sampling of work by local dance luminaries, "Choreographers' Evening," curated this year by Sally Rousse.
LAST YEAR, PEOPLE COULDN’T SHUT UP
about Choreographers’ Eve
. Whether they were ranting, calling it “the worst ever,” or howling about censorship (Jaime Carrera’s full-frontal was seen only at the late show), or just raving about whatever dance caught their fancies (the lemons, the Native American traditional dance, the bikinis on bikes, the Spam
), they were talking
—at the show, at other events, on the Walker's performing arts blog. But this year, the Walker blog
is bare as a frozen lake on the subject, and I’ve had all of one conversation about the work at Choreographers’ Eve
(curated, this year, by Sally Rousse
What does it mean? Was Choreographers’ Eve
dull? Well, yes, a little. It’s not that there wasn’t good work, but (with one exception) there was nothing compulsive, nothing transgressive, nothing strange. We could argue about whether a work of art needs to be any of the above, but there’s no doubt that weird work stirs thought and discussion. Take the one exception, Judith Howard
’s Orange Episodes.
Popsicle-orange clothes, including a muff and fur hat, also a lush apricot carpet—bird sounds, flutters, and was that a snippet of Swan Lake
in the soundtrack? Play with hiding and revealing, the curtains swishing open on one tableau, then a second curtain opening to reveal another—it was a strange little trip into someone’s memory/closet/fantasy, inexplicable and indelible.
Howard’s work, like several other pieces on the program, felt partial, but while Howard challenges the audience, the other choreographers seemed to be talking more to themselves. Not that there’s anything wrong with that; we all need to talk to ourselves, especially in the course of an artistic project. But it does make for more opaque, less memorable work. Pramila Vasudevan
’s pocket summary of The Wet Bug Hush
sounds brilliantly demented, but the excerpt she showed was notable mostly for her burbly, alt-bharatanatyam
style—not for concept or overall construction. Mary Easter’s Right?
was a snippet of mostly speech and acting, not, I would say, dancing. Maggie Bergeron
’s I was hoping you would agree
had some play of mirror and echo; Nicholas Lincoln’s Jane
had a sense of drama; Chris Yon
’s Teardrop Terror
gave a window onto an inner logic. But all three pieces were fundamentally quiet—the middles of some future evenings of dance, let’s hope.
Howard’s Orange Episodes,
with its meticulous tableaux and its structured but bustling movement, also felt like a dance I could watch a few times. Layers, second and third thoughts, a certain depth of detail—these elements were, unfortunately, lacking in many other pieces, even when the pieces were bright, shiny, and fun to watch. The Battlecats
’ hip-hop Revolution
certainly had enough gravity-defying tricks to hold one’s attention, but the military theme never got beyond gimmickry. Were they child soldiers? US troops? Revolutionaries? Good guys? Bad guys? Who cares?! Check out those headspins! I liked Dustin Haug and Tamin Totzke’s The Evolution of Story
—what a sweet and playful movement exploration—but I can’t say much else about it. Another sweet bit was Emily Tyra and Caroline Fermin’s video . . . found you!
: two ballerinas reversing Yves Klein
, sort of, and directing their own painted bodies across white paper—but not directing themselves into anything particularly new. SuperGroup’s Teletubby-costumed dance-spoof (they checked off all the activities comprising contemporary dance, including “Pop song” and “Pop song reprise”) made me laugh; but, again, my reaction stops there. Jaime Carrera, much tamer this year, slipped on a petticoat for a skirt dance. He sure is good at skirt dancing—he flips, and steps, and turns… and then he keeps flipping, stepping, and turning for another three minutes.
Choreography is hard. Tim Cameron
promised plenty of concept in the program notes for Collective Bargaining,
but the actual work hovered between “bad” (as in intentionally awkward) and, well, bad (as in poorly constructed). To make something vivid, solid, yet yielding and deep, and to do all that in seven minutes—well, it’s no wonder if the resulting work sometimes can’t entirely live up to the demand.
Where this Choreographers’ Eve
did live up to expectations, though, was in the dancing. In fact, this year's show might have been renamed "Dancers’ Eve." I’m thinking of the extraordinary control and concentration of Maggie Bergeron (in her own work) and Taryn Griggs (in Chris Yon’s):both dance with such intention, so that each motion seems real, an instant of desire. Or the clean lines and cool power of Sarah Jacobs (in Nicholas Lincoln’s work), Emily Tyra, and Caroline Fermin. The explosive pyrotechnics of the Battlecats (B-Boys J-Sun, Sequel, and Daylight), juxtaposed against the sinuous evolutions of Pramila Vasudevan: fire and flight, water and wind.
The keynote of this year’s Choreographers’ Eve
might be Galen Treuer
’s pre-show installation, Some dances you might remember.
Treuer scattered thirteen dancers or pairs of dancers across the Walker, all of them recreating snippets of dances (and mostly ones they didn’t originally perform in). It was impossible to take in the choreography; instead, the dancers became almost like mobiles, beautiful sculptures moving in set paths. It was a fit beginning for this year's quiet but hardworking Choreographers’ Eve.
About the writer: Lightsey Darst
writes on dance for Mpls/St Paul magazine
and is also a poet and editor of mnartists.org’s What Light: This Week’s Poem
2008 Choreographers' Evening curator Sally Rousse, photo by Cameron Wittig (courtesy of the Walker Art Center)