mnartists.org

Home » Forum Home » mnartists.org Forums » The Plaza

Topic: Feedback on Articles
Replies: 1,148   Pages: 77   Last Post: Dec 6, 2005 8:40 PM by: jaime longoria

Reply to this Topic
Search Forum

Back to Topic List
Replies: 1,148   Pages: 77   [ Previous | 1 ... 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 | Next ]
jaime longoria

Posts: 1,161
Registered: Oct 7, 2002
Re: Feedback on Articles
Posted: Aug 11, 2005 3:05 PM
  Reply

Good deeds alone will not get you into heaven. The great secret that Christ brought was that this is our own heaven or hell as live it in our hearts.

Are you familiar with the Royal Chicano Airforrce? They was awesome in that they broke through the museum barrier with very little sound!!!!

You are right. The WAC is going to at some point as the question of what is "Coyote Art". But ironically the question will have to come from outside the "United States". Some other "Latitude" than the one Jimmy occupies.

I like your word "Crapolla". May I use it for performaces?

Bob: I am a very student of "New" capitalism. Try this: I have $1,000,000.00 in the bank in notes tied to time. I use them to "borrow" a credit line; I buy stock in a company and them use the same stock to borrow again and buy stock in another company. The companies both tank. I file for banrupcy and claim my notes as my scource of living expenses. Do I get away with it under all of the "tax" breaks given to the "non poor"?

Things that I think about while I read about the history of money?

What do think about "New World Phobia" ?

coyote A

> Well, Coyote, I'm completely serious when I suggest
> that someone don the felt, take Beuys out for a real
> walk, and chase you around a gallery. The
> copy-writers that scribble for the wall Placard could
> add the appropriate crapolla text for the
> performance, and you could become a downed
> fighter-pilot for the local Latino Community.
>
> You could commiserate over the horrors of
> "late-capitalism" and the shortage of taco fillings
> on West Lake Street. Or some such attractive
> multi-culti bullshit, and a WAC curator would wet his
> or her panties to the delight of trashing yet another
> cannon filled with Western metaphor. I gotta get to
> work; hey, I helped an Asian woman hang two pictures
> yesterday, am I now cleansed of some particular
> Western phobia? I can forever hope!

Bob Schulz

Posts: 416
From: Brooklyn Park, MN
Registered: Aug 15, 2003
Re: Feedback on Articles
Posted: Aug 11, 2005 4:22 PM
  Reply

So, it seems

Bob Schulz

Posts: 416
From: Brooklyn Park, MN
Registered: Aug 15, 2003
Re: Feedback on Articles
Posted: Aug 11, 2005 4:45 PM
  Reply

There is fog

Shawn Holster

Posts: 74
Registered: Nov 22, 2004
Re: Feedback on Articles
Posted: Aug 11, 2005 6:38 PM
  Reply

"The latent causes of faction are thus sown in the nature of man; and we see them everywhere brought into different degrees of activity, according to the different circumstances of civil society. A zeal for different opinions concerning religion, concerning government, and many other points, as well of speculation as of practice; an attatchment to different leaders ambitiously contending for pre-eminence and power; or to persons of other descriptions whos fortunes have been interesting to the human passions, have, in turn divided mankind into parties, inflamed them with mutual animosity, and rendered them much more disposed to vex and opress each other than to co-operate for their common good. So strong is this propensity of mankind to fall into mutual animosities, that where no substantial occasion presents itself, the most frivolous and fanciful distictions have been sufficient to kindle their unfriendly passions and exite their most violent conflicts. But the most common and durable source of factions has been the various and unequal distribution of property. Those who hold and those who are without property have ever formed distinct interests in society.

-James Madison, Nov. 22, 1787
The Federalist No.10-

Gabriel Combs

Posts: 1,497
Registered: Jun 16, 2002
Re: Feedback on Articles
Posted: Aug 12, 2005 12:33 AM
  Reply



Bob Schulz

Posts: 416
From: Brooklyn Park, MN
Registered: Aug 15, 2003
Re: Feedback on Articles
Posted: Aug 12, 2005 12:12 PM
  Reply

And to the extent

Bob Schulz

Posts: 416
From: Brooklyn Park, MN
Registered: Aug 15, 2003
Re: Feedback on Articles
Posted: Aug 13, 2005 11:34 AM
  Reply

I would be the first

Shawn Holster

Posts: 74
Registered: Nov 22, 2004
Re: Feedback on Articles
Posted: Aug 13, 2005 12:59 PM
  Reply

Bob, had just written a response, but something timed out and I lost it. Will redo it and cut/paste.

Shawn Holster

Posts: 74
Registered: Nov 22, 2004
Re: Feedback on Articles
Posted: Aug 13, 2005 1:47 PM
  Reply

Okay, allow me to break it down as to why I thought this quote pertinent.

“The latent causes of faction are thus sown in the nature of man; and we see them everywhere brought into different degrees of activity, according to the different circumstances of civil society. A zeal for different opinions concerning religion, concerning government, and many other points, as well of speculation as of practice,”

I think it's simple human nature to fight, where there is no reason to fight, we'll find one. Always have always will. No matter what your view or perspective, somewhere out there someone is going to disagree, because what's in my best interest is going to run counter to someone else's best interest. It's basic human nature to be competitive and get the upper hand. I'll go so far as to say that it's basic animal nature; dogs do it, monkeys do it, cats do it, we do it. Animals may not put semantic labels on it, but they have struggles for dominance as well.


“ an attatchment to different leaders ambitiously contending for pre-eminence and power; or to persons of other descriptions whos fortunes have been interesting to the human passions, have, in turn divided mankind into parties, inflamed them with mutual animosity, and rendered them much more disposed to vex and opress each other than to co-operate for their common good. So strong is this propensity of mankind to fall into mutual animosities, that where no substantial occasion presents itself, the most frivolous and fanciful distictions have been sufficient to kindle their unfriendly passions and exite their most violent conflicts.”

The tools of division, and by extention, conquer. The tone today (and not just in our contemporary age) is more polarized than I can personally remember. Left-Right, red-blue, two simple examples, there are many more but for examples sake and simplicities sake I'll stop there. Faction, throughout the world and within our own borders is just thick. I don't think that any faction is more right or wrong than the other, or that any faction is immune from the devices of corruption than the other. Eventually, within any system, someone is gonna get hurt. And yes, I do think that we have a propensity for head chopping of those we don't like or see eye to eye with, internationally and domestically. We've done it with ropes and dogs and guns instead of swords and video cameras. Different tools, same action. To place these terms of division on ourselves is a device of those in power to stay in power by keeping us bickering and distracted from the idea that all anyone needs or wants is a roof, a full gut, and clothes on our backs. And once we have that, in the perfect world, we should be happy. But were not, once again the human propensity to find a fight if there is none.
The last part of the quote was included out of keeping it whole,(as much as exerpted context can be) and to fill out the idea that most conflict is centered around the struggle for possession and dominance. It makes me chuckle whenever I see anyone claiming some sort of Utopian moral high ground that denies basic human nature, whatever faction their speaking from. Madison wasn't encouraging envy, but did recognize that it's the nature of man for better or worse, that it's inescapable. He may not have grasped the statistics of the next two centuries, but throughout his writings and in his rationale for the structuring of the Union as a union as opposed to a collection of (at the time) 13 Nation States was to protect this Union from internal and external aggressions and the murders of the populace. Attempting to protect the interests of the smaller states from the interests of the larger, and recognizing that it was inevitable if we were not to form into a Federation. He had the example of Shay in Massachusets fresh in his memory.
As far as my motive, just thought it applicable to today. Factional bickering, self interested aggression, a nation divided as opposed to a nation united, the inevitability of oppression of one over the other….seems pertinent to keep the conversation rolling. Have a good one, need to get on with the day, and look forward to a continuation of the discussion.

Bob Schulz

Posts: 416
From: Brooklyn Park, MN
Registered: Aug 15, 2003
Re: Feedback on Articles
Posted: Aug 15, 2005 12:53 PM
  Reply

There is no right to a roof and full gut or happiness

Jim Grafsgaard

Posts: 15
Registered: Feb 19, 2003
Re: Feedback on Articles
Posted: Aug 16, 2005 11:15 PM
  Reply

Hi everyone - I just want to put in 2cents, regarding the ongoing debates in this forum I have been catching up on. Lately focusing on "us" vs "them" in various line-ups.
It is good reading, at times. I know some writers personally (Sr.Longoria and Herr Schulz, in particular). Others I know only by their artwork or writing.
I just want to say "thank you" to those who take time to present their ideas, or the respected ideas of others, clearly and concisely.
Other "wisenheimers" (to reference the upcoming MAEP show, with artwork by James F. Cleary BFA) evidently prefer cleverness to clarity. They get a bit tiresome.
I respect everyone's willingness to speak up, and the occasional entertainment value of a good rant. But if a person has repeatedly made their point (e.g. anti-american leftists bad/ pro-capitalist patriots good) or writes primarily to serve themselves (e.g. self-publicizing thinly disguised as performance art) - may they please give it a rest?

Ok, the pot needs stirring - so thanks too to the pot stirrers. But if you have nothing more to say than repeating a narrow theme endlessly in various ways , your effort tho clever is artless.

Bob Schulz

Posts: 416
From: Brooklyn Park, MN
Registered: Aug 15, 2003
Re: Feedback on Articles
Posted: Aug 17, 2005 11:27 AM
  Reply

A point, for instance,

Ray Rolfe

Posts: 3,263
From: Northeast Minneapolis
Registered: Sep 5, 2001
Re: Feedback on Articles
Posted: Aug 17, 2005 8:35 PM
  Reply
Peace over Tehran.jpg (236.7 K)

Peace over Tehran

Jim Grafsgaard

Posts: 15
Registered: Feb 19, 2003
Re: Feedback on Articles
Posted: Aug 17, 2005 11:49 PM
  Reply

Bob I appreciate your argument, and have paid many cumulative hours attention to it. Thank our system you needn't accept silence. You are well-informed and you are opinionated. Your passion is powerful, expressed best I think in person, or in paint. Call me dense, but I think your presentation in this forum too often lacks a functional frame, which leaves your audience and fellow-posters baffled as to your referents (Ono/Tehran? Coyote/Hopkins? Free peoples against tyrannies...are you talking Irani people vs. the Shah, or colonies vs. King George II, or who? who cares?)

More to the (thousand) points, I don't accept all your assumptions.

Its not your job to re-educate me. I believe our job as artists is to define "our culture" and "the arts", and like Bueys said anyone who is willing to define those terms in their lives and social spheres may participate, and are encouraged. For me the job is a process of discovery, experimentation and connection which constantly enlarges my understanding of the world and myself. This is an active process, and it brings me into real communication and cooperation with amazing people toward concrete goals - every day.

The US commits wrongs everyday, just as it commits great honorable deeds everyday. Probably most often, as a nation and as a government of human beings, it reaches high and falls far short. Am I to accept murders in retaliation to headchoppings in retaliation for ill-concieved invasions in retailiation for terrorist suicide highjackers in retaliation for x...for y..for x...for y...? War is an evolved behavior, imbedded in our (global/human) culture because we are our own natural enemy, and competitive fighting has helped us develop as a stronger, more technological and wealthier species. We create chaos and battle to regain control. More specifically, war is a means for individuals and organized groups to gain power, status and fortunes - at the obvious expense of the "enemy" and the masses of warriors and non-combatants dead or maimed on both sides. Morality and logic have precious little to do with it. It is a never-ending violent cycle mostly encouraged by those who have the most to gain and the least to lose.

Instead of railing against "one world view", how about viewing the whole as "one world"? The amazing beauty of it is the diversity - genetic, ecological, communal, lingual, spiritual, artistic. All the various parts fit together - feeding, digesting, succeeding, transforming each other in immeasurable ways continually. Like you love to point out, every argument has its perfectly balanced polar opposite - the Taoists call this yin/yang. Change is our only constant, and the most we can hope to affect is change toward a less disastrous equilibrium stable over a reasonable span of time. The top is totally dependent on the bottom, which depends in turn on sustaining conditions - most concretely I am talking about the biosphere, since we have no life beyond it.

Bob, you clearly identify yourself with the concepts of right and left and their (very recent!) histories of struggle. Your expertise and insight on these matters has value.

But you cannot expect others to accede this forum toward a political or cultural discourse that works solely in the historical paradigms of right/left, capitalism vs. socialism, christians vs. islamists. We (including you) are not so narrow! We are not so lacking in experience nor imagination!

Sam Spiczka

Posts: 1,671
From: Sartell, MN
Registered: Jul 20, 2001
Re: Feedback on Articles
Posted: Aug 17, 2005 11:58 PM
  Reply

> But you cannot expect others to accede this forum
> toward a political or cultural discourse that works
> solely in the historical paradigms of right/left,
> capitalism vs. socialism, christians vs. islamists.
> We (including you) are not so narrow! We are not so
> lacking in experience nor imagination!

Very nice, Jim.

Replies: 1,148   Pages: 77   [ Previous | 1 ... 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 | Next ]
Back to Topic List